On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Aloni wrote: > + > +void print_bad_syscall(struct task_struct *task) > +{ > + printk("process %s (%d) tried to syscall from an executable segment!\n", >task->comm, task->pid); > +} Hmm, should be "writable segment", perhaps ;-) -- Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscall... Nicolas Noble
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscall... Gerhard Mack
- Re: [RFC] prevention of sys... Dan Hollis
- Re: [RFC] prevention of sys... Gerhard Mack
- Re: [RFC] prevention of sys... Dan Hollis
- Re: [RFC] prevention of sys... Gerhard Mack
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable s... Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Erik Mouw
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Nicolas Noble
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Jeff Dike
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Dan Aloni
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... David Huggins-Daines
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable s... Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writab... David Huggins-Daines
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segmen... Mark Zealey