Nakajima, Jun wrote: > The hypervisor detection machanism is generic, and the signature > returned is implentation specific. Having a list of all hypervisor > signatures sounds fine to me as we are detecting vendor-specific > processor(s) in the native. And I don't expect the list is large. > >
I'm confused about what you're proposing. I was thinking that a kernel looking for the generic hypervisor interface would check for a specific signature at some cpuid leaf, and then go about using it from there. If not, how does is it supposed to detect the generic hypervisor interface? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/