On 9/14/07, Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that a workaround went into the kernel > (commit 3320ad994afb2c44ad34b3b34c3c5cf0da297331) > for a feature that is not yet switched on by the OS. > > Because Yinghai's patch is rejected. Or did I miss something? > Did Andi rejected just the third patch and not the first two? Hm, ... > > (And obviously Dean Gaudet must have had a system where MSR 0xc0010058 > was accordingly configured - by the BIOS or himself?) >
the three patches are independent... [PATCH] x86_64: check MSR to get MMCONFIG for AMD Family 10h Opteron http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/12/247 [PATCH] x86_64: check and enable MMCONFIG for AMD Family 10h Opteron http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/12/248 [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is used http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/12/352 the first two is doing as the way as hpa think that we should do. the third one: ak doesn't like it, but greg said it is needed for broken MCFG.... and andrew already put them into -mm. one side fact is, I could use mmconfig when acpi=off too. YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
