On Thu 01 Aug 03:07 PDT 2019, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

[..]
> +static const struct msm_pingroup sc7180_groups[] = {
> +     [0] = PINGROUP(0, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
> +     [1] = PINGROUP(1, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
> +     [2] = PINGROUP(2, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
> +     [3] = PINGROUP(3, SOUTH, qup01, sp_cmu, dbg_out, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, 
> _),
> +     [4] = PINGROUP(4, NORTH, sdc1_tb, _, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _, _), [5] = 
> PINGROUP(5, NORTH, sdc2_tb, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _),
> +     [6] = PINGROUP(6, NORTH, qup11, qup11, _, _, _, _, _, _, _), [7] = 
> PINGROUP(7, NORTH, qup11, qup11, ddr_bist, _, _, _, _, _, _),

5 and 7 deserve to be on their own line :)

Apart from that:

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

Reply via email to