> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dr. David Gilbert wrote: > > > I got wondering as to whether the various journaling file > > system activities were designed to survive the occasional > > unclean shutdown or were designed to allow the user to just pull > > the plug as a regular means of shutting down. > > > Thoughts? Journaling filesystems only guarantee consistancy of filesystem metadata. Data that has not been flushed from buffers will be lost, and applications not given a chance to shut themselves down may do bad things if you just unplug the box. Journaling mostly means not having to run FSCK. -M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Dr. David Gilbert
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutd... Rik van Riel
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean s... Michael Rothwell
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean s... Andi Kleen
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean s... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing uncle... Alex Belits
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing u... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allow... Alex Belits
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing uncle... Dr. David Gilbert
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing u... Helge Hafting
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or allow... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or a... David Woodhouse
- Re: Journaling: Surviving or a... David Lang