On 2019-07-26 01:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Move code to helper for reuse in power management routines

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>
---
  drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
index c40ab443e723..215dc81cdf73 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
@@ -984,6 +984,15 @@ static struct sdw_master_ops sdw_intel_ops = {
        .post_bank_switch = intel_post_bank_switch,
  };
+static int intel_init(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
+{
+       /* Initialize shim and controller */
+       intel_link_power_up(sdw);
+       intel_shim_init(sdw);
+
+       return sdw_cdns_init(&sdw->cdns);
+}

Why don't we check polling status for _link_power_up? I've already met slow starting devices in the past. If polling fails and -EAGAIN is returned, flow of initialization should react appropriately e.g. poll till MAX_TIMEOUT of some sort -or- collapse.

Reply via email to