On 7/25/19 3:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 7/25/19 3:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, h...@zytor.com wrote: >>>> On July 25, 2019 2:48:30 PM PDT, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But seriously I think it's not completely insane what they are doing >>>>> and the table based approach is definitely more readable and maintainable >>>>> than the existing stuff. >>>> >>>> Doing this table based does seem like a good idea. >>> >>> The question is whether we use a 'toclear' table or a 'preserve' table. I'd >>> argue that the 'preserve' approach is saner. >>> >> I agree. > > Now we just need to volunteer someone to do that :) >
Happy to jump in and do that, since I have an easy repro of the warning here. In case you missed an earlier response [1], I did have a lingering question about what you had in mind for the "to preserve" approach: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ffd7a9b6-8017-2d2c-c4f7-65563094c...@nvidia.com thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA
