On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:24:42 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Intel framebuffer mis-calculated pixel clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- a/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
> @@ -924,10 +920,10 @@ calc_pll_params(int index, int clock, u32 *retm1, u32
> *retm2, u32 *retn, u32 *re
> if (m > pll->max_m)
> m = pll->max_m - 1;
> for (testm = m - 1; testm <= m; testm++) {
> - f_out = calc_vclock3(index, m, n, p);
> + f_out = calc_vclock3(index, testm, n, p);
> if (splitm(index, testm, &m1, &m2)) {
> - WRN_MSG("cannot split m = %d\n", m);
> - n++;
> + WRN_MSG("cannot split m = %d\n",
> + testm);
> continue;
> }
> if (clock > f_out)
and... what are the consequences of this miscalculation? I need to know
such things so that I can decide whether a change is needed in 2.6.23. And
2.6.22.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
