On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:00:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:02 +0100 > Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > I agree with Masami, that the selftest actually caught a bug here. I > > > think the arch code may need to change as the purpose of Masami's > > > changes was to enable kprobes earlier in boot. The selftest failing > > > means that an early kprobe will fail too. > > > > I just got back from holiday and catching up with emails. Do I still > > need to merge the arm64 fix making the debug initialisation a > > core_initcall()? > > > > Can we actually get kprobes invoked before init_kprobes() has been > > called? > > Bah, I can't remember everything that we discussed. I thought there was > some more patches that obsoleted my work around. Everything has been > pushed to Linus, can you see if the upstream still has issues for you?
Upstream is fine since you reverted the postcore_initcall(init_kprobes) change and used subsys_initcall() instead. So I don't think we need any arch changes. -- Catalin
