On 9/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. >
By definition any container (about to be renamed control group) subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit redundant. Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched" Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
