On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:47 AM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > The gold linker has known issues of failing the build both in random and in > predictible ways: > > - The x86/X32 VDSO build fails with: > > arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime-x32.o:vclock_gettime.c:function do_hres: > error: relocation overflow: reference to 'hvclock_page' > > That's a known issue for years and the usual workaround is to disable > CONFIG_X86_32 > > - A recent build failure is caused by turning a relocation into an > absolute one for unknown reasons. See link below. > > - There are a couple of gold workarounds applied already, but reports > about broken builds with ld.gold keep coming in on a regular base and in > most cases the root cause is unclear. > > In context of the most recent fail H.J. stated: > > "Since building a workable kernel for different kernel configurations > isn't a requirement for gold, I don't recommend gold for kernel." > > So instead of dealing with attempts to duct tape gold support without > understanding the root cause and without support from the gold folks, fail > the build when gold is detected. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/came9roqmqkq0lnpm25ye_yt0fkp05wmhorwc0ardb53mifk...@mail.gmail.com > ---
The code looks OK in the build system point of view. Please let me confirm this, just in case: For now, we give up all architectures, not only x86, right? I have not not heard much from other arch maintainers. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
