On Sat, 2007-08-09 at 18:51 -0400, James C. Georgas wrote:
> If I select X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, then ACPI_NUMA is (properly) selected
> automatically, but ACPI is not selected automatically. This causes
> ACPI_NUMA to not be built, and the kernel compile fails with unresolved
> symbols.
>
Uh, it seems that I'm getting different results this time. Now,
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA does select ACPI, but PM (parent of ACPI) is not
automatically selected. Same result for the compile, though. Boom.
I seem to get different behaviour in general on subsequent runs of make
menuconfig.
For example, the last time I ran it, I was able to select K8_NUMA and
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, independently of one another.
This time, though, the visibility of K8_NUMA is dependent on whether or
not X86_64_ACPI_NUMA is selected.
Should K8_NUMA and X86_64_ACPI_NUMA both be under NUMA, and independent
of one another?
James
/\V
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
