On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 12:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Actually, list_for_each_continue_rcu() needs to be removed in favor of > your new list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(). There are currently only > two users as of 2.6.22. One of them immediately does a list_entry(), > and the other would convert easily as well. So please let me know > when this gets accepted! ;-)
Heh, ok, I won't add the text to that macro if you want to remove it anyway. I guess I'll add your paragraph and ... hmm. what do I do with it? Who's responsible for list.h? Can I push this through John Linville and Dave Miller so I can get the fix into his tree easily without synchronisation? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
