On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:10:54PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anybody got a proposed scheme for the case where somebody like myself > who is *not* a member of the Maintainer Cabal has looked at a patch, and > found a valid show-stopper that's bigger than just whitespace (breaks on > 64-bit, locking issues, etc), or other commentary that *should* be addressed > before it gets merged? I'd like *some* way to tag a patch with "I had an > issue with V1, but the author addressed it to my satisfaction in V2".... > > (Note that includes "the author convinced me the patch was right and I was > wrong"...)
I think that'd be Reviewed-By. While you are not part of the smokey room cabal you have shown technical expertise in various areas so it seems perfectly fine to have reviewed-by from you. The fix vs a previous version should probably be just in the text with a paragraph ala: Issue blah in a previous version as found by Valdis Kletnieks has been fixed by doing foo. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
