-----"Jason Gunthorpe" <j...@mellanox.com> wrote: ----- >To: "Bernard Metzler" <b...@zurich.ibm.com> >From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <j...@mellanox.com> >Date: 07/11/2019 01:53PM >Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <l...@kernel.org>, "Stephen Rothwell" ><s...@canb.auug.org.au>, "Doug Ledford" <dledf...@redhat.com>, "David >Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>, "Networking" <net...@vger.kernel.org>, >"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-n...@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel >Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of >the net-next tree > >On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > >> That listen will not sleep. The socket is just marked >> listening. > >Eh? siw_listen_address() calls siw_cep_alloc() which does: > > struct siw_cep *cep = kzalloc(sizeof(*cep), GFP_KERNEL); > >Which is sleeping. Many other cases too. > >Jason > > Ah, true! I was after really deep sleeps like user level socket accept() calls ;) So you are correct of course.
Thanks! Bernard
