On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Hakan Lennestal wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Woodhouse writes:
> > 
> > The IBM DTLA drives aren't in the hpt366 bad_ata66_4 list still.
> 
> I second this ! 
> Until the hpt-problem is solved (if it ever will be)
> we really need the IBM DTLA drives in the bad-list.
> This configuration (IBM DTLA disks on hpt3* controller) can't be
> that unusual ?

So why are the IBM drives picked on? I thought this was a hpt366 problem,
and possibly has only shown up with IBM drives so far.

It sounds like the proper fix would be to not enable ata66 by default.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to