On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
> 
> > SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
> > it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
> 
> You should at least Cc the SGI/HP folks on that. They are still
> around. Done so.

Thanks Thomas.  The SGI UV is now HPE Superdome Flex and is
very much still supported.

Thanks.

> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 25 -------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > index b47a71820f35..64afe1215495 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > @@ -689,31 +689,6 @@ void native_flush_tlb_multi(const struct cpumask 
> > *cpumask,
> >             trace_tlb_flush(TLB_REMOTE_SEND_IPI,
> >                             (info->end - info->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >  
> > -   if (is_uv_system()) {
> > -           /*
> > -            * This whole special case is confused.  UV has a "Broadcast
> > -            * Assist Unit", which seems to be a fancy way to send IPIs.
> > -            * Back when x86 used an explicit TLB flush IPI, UV was
> > -            * optimized to use its own mechanism.  These days, x86 uses
> > -            * smp_call_function_many(), but UV still uses a manual IPI,
> > -            * and that IPI's action is out of date -- it does a manual
> > -            * flush instead of calling flush_tlb_func_remote().  This
> > -            * means that the percpu tlb_gen variables won't be updated
> > -            * and we'll do pointless flushes on future context switches.
> > -            *
> > -            * Rather than hooking native_flush_tlb_multi() here, I think
> > -            * that UV should be updated so that smp_call_function_many(),
> > -            * etc, are optimal on UV.
> > -            */
> > -           flush_tlb_func_local(info);
> > -
> > -           cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
> > -           if (cpumask)
> > -                   smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> > -                                          (void *)info, 1);
> > -           return;
> > -   }
> > -
> >     /*
> >      * If no page tables were freed, we can skip sending IPIs to
> >      * CPUs in lazy TLB mode. They will flush the CPU themselves
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > 

-- 
Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager
HPE - Hewlett Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  r...@hpe.com

Reply via email to