> This had been a report for a non-portable computer which should (Duron) > indeed have a TSC, that is, /proc/cpuinfo lists one ;-) Do 486s > generally have APM so it might be worth fixing/working around for them? > > If so, would re-reading from CMOS for boxes without TSC be a "valid" > solution? The TSC one is fairly sane, the CMOS gets messy because host and CMOS time are not always the same - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Erik Mouw
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Erik Mouw
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre3 Guest section DW