> This had been a report for a non-portable computer which should (Duron)
> indeed have a TSC, that is, /proc/cpuinfo lists one ;-) Do 486s
> generally have APM so it might be worth fixing/working around for them?
> 
> If so, would re-reading from CMOS for boxes without TSC be a "valid"
> solution?

The TSC one is fairly sane, the CMOS gets messy because host and CMOS time
are not always the same

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to