Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 11:22:42 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We really can't. We _only_ have load-and-zero. And it has to be 16-byte aligned. xchg() is just not something the CPU implements. Oh bugger... you do have real problems. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Grant Grundler
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Roman Zippel
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to ato... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to ato... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] move xchg/cmpxchg to atomic.h Grant Grundler