On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:07:06 +0530, Satyam Sharma said: > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > > --- kernel/softlockup.c~fix 2007-09-02 04:23:49.000000000 +0530 > > +++ kernel/softlockup.c 2007-09-02 04:34:45.000000000 +0530 > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Ick, I botched a trivial patch, it doesn't even apply. Updated one below > (with indentation fix as added bonus :-) > > > [PATCH -mm] softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch fix (v2) > > kernel/softlockup.c: In function 'softlockup_tick': > kernel/softlockup.c:125: warning: 'regs' is used uninitialized in this > function > > is a genuine bug (will cause an oops in all probability,
Thanks for catching this, it was actually managing to inspire a full-scale panic - flashing LEDs and the like. Now to go track down the probably self-inflicted cause of the soft-lockup message.. ;)
pgpPxCC1PYrSo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
