On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:37:13 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote: > > > +static int gup_huge_pd(hugepd_t hugepd > > Naming nitlet: we have hugepd and we also have huge_pd. We have > hugepte and we also have huge_pte. It make things a bit hard to > remember and it would be nice to make it all consistent sometime. > > We're consistent with huge_pud and almost consistent with huge_pmd. > > To be fully consistent I guess we should make all of them have the > underscore. Or not have it.
Either way is fine with me. Feel free to fix up per your preference.
