On 6/12/19 11:48 PM, Nadav Amit wrote: > Support the new interface of flush_tlb_multi, which also flushes the > local CPU's TLB, instead of flush_tlb_others that does not. This > interface is more performant since it parallelize remote and local TLB > flushes. > > The actual implementation of flush_tlb_multi() is almost identical to > that of flush_tlb_others().
This confused me a bit. I thought we didn't support paravirtualized flush_tlb_multi() from reading earlier in the series. But, it seems like that might be Xen-only and doesn't apply to KVM and paravirtualized KVM has no problem supporting flush_tlb_multi(). Is that right? It might be good to include some of that background in the changelog to set the context.
