On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:44 AM David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote: > > From: Dmitry Torokhov > > Sent: 23 June 2019 07:32 > > > > Instead of doing conversion by hand, let's use the proper accessors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c > > b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c > > index c639ebce914c..ec770226e119 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > > #include <linux/input/mt.h> > > #include <linux/input/touchscreen.h> > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > > > #define WORK_REGISTER_THRESHOLD 0x00 > > #define WORK_REGISTER_REPORT_RATE 0x08 > > @@ -239,8 +240,8 @@ static irqreturn_t edt_ft5x06_ts_isr(int irq, void > > *dev_id) > > if (tsdata->version == EDT_M06 && type == TOUCH_EVENT_DOWN) > > continue; > > > > - x = ((buf[0] << 8) | buf[1]) & 0x0fff; > > - y = ((buf[2] << 8) | buf[3]) & 0x0fff; > > + x = get_unaligned_be16(buf) & 0x0fff; > > + y = get_unaligned_be16(buf + 2) & 0x0fff; > > You might as well delete the pointless masking with 0xff.
Hmm... Does it guarantee the most significant nibble to be always 0? (Note 16-bit value and three f:s in the mask) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
