CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS was introduced in a very old commit from pre-2.6
kernel release commit 6a4a93f9c0d5 ("[CPUFREQ] Fix 'out of sync'
issue").

Probably the initial idea was to just avoid these checks for set_policy
type drivers and then things got changed over the years. And it is very
unclear why these checks are there at all.

Replace the CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS check with has_target(), which makes
more sense now.

cpufreq_notify_transition() is only called for has_target() type driver
and not for set_policy type, and the check is simply redundant. Remove
it as well.

Also remove () around freq comparison statement as they aren't required
and checkpatch also warns for them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 54befd775bd6..41ac701e324f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -359,12 +359,10 @@ static void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct 
cpufreq_policy *policy,
                 * which is not equal to what the cpufreq core thinks is
                 * "old frequency".
                 */
-               if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
-                       if (policy->cur && (policy->cur != freqs->old)) {
-                               pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq 
assumed %u kHz\n",
-                                        freqs->old, policy->cur);
-                               freqs->old = policy->cur;
-                       }
+               if (policy->cur && policy->cur != freqs->old) {
+                       pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq assumed 
%u kHz\n",
+                                freqs->old, policy->cur);
+                       freqs->old = policy->cur;
                }
 
                srcu_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list,
@@ -1618,8 +1616,7 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
        if (policy->fast_switch_enabled)
                return ret_freq;
 
-       if (ret_freq && policy->cur &&
-               !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
+       if (has_target() && ret_freq && policy->cur) {
                /* verify no discrepancy between actual and
                                        saved value exists */
                if (unlikely(ret_freq != policy->cur)) {
-- 
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b

Reply via email to