On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:41:27 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > On Thursday 30 August 2007 1:28:17 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> The old "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been changed to > >>> "ramdisk_size=<ram_size>" to make it clearer. The original > >>> "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been kept around for compatibility reasons, > >>> but it may be removed in the future. > >> ... > >> > >> i just the other day submitted a patch to remove that backward > >> compatibility, and the m68k portion of it has already been acked by > >> geert uytterhoeven.
I couldn't find it. Can you provide a pointer to it? > > Could you mention it in feature-removal-schedule.txt? (People check that > > for > > warning of upcoming changes that impact existing code. They may not notice > > something elsewhere after they've got it working...) > > > > The same objection applies to this as to the previous one. In that > respect, an Ack from a maintainer of an almost unused architecture is > meaningless (sorry, Geert.) Peter, what are you objecting to, Rob's comment, Robert's comment, Robert's patch, or my patch? Thanks. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
