On 6/12/2019 8:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
> 
> Also, because there is no need to save the file dentry, remove the
> variables that were saving them as they were never even being used once
> set.
> 
> Cc: Sinan Kaya <ok...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agr...@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Brown <david.br...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vk...@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dmaeng...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

Interesting. Wouldn't debugfs_create_file() blow up if dir is NULL
for some reason?


+               debugfs_create_file("stats", S_IRUGO, dir, chan,
+                                   &hidma_chan_fops);

Note that code ignores the return value of hidma_debug_init();
It was just trying to do clean up on debugfs failure by calling

        debugfs_remove_recursive(dmadev->debugfs);

Reply via email to