Quoting Anson Huang (2019-06-08 02:58:18) > Hi, Stephen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org> > > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 2:01 AM > > To: bjorn.anders...@linaro.org; catalin.mari...@arm.com; > > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; dingu...@kernel.org; > > enric.balle...@collabora.com; feste...@gmail.com; > > horms+rene...@verge.net.au; ja...@amarulasolutions.com; > > ker...@pengutronix.de; l.st...@pengutronix.de; linux-arm- > > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > ker...@vger.kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; > > maxime.rip...@bootlin.com; mturque...@baylibre.com; o...@lixom.net; > > robh...@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix .de <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>; > > shawn...@kernel.org; will.dea...@arm.com; Abel Vesa > > <abel.v...@nxp.com>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.d...@nxp.com>; Anson > > Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai <ping....@nxp.com>; Leonard > > Crestez <leonard.cres...@nxp.com> > > Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-...@nxp.com> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 3/4] clk: imx: Add support for i.MX8MN clock driver > > > > Quoting Anson Huang (2019-06-06 17:50:28) > > > > > > I will use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() instead of ioremap(), and > > > can you be more specific about devmified clk registration? > > > > > > > I mean using things like devm_clk_hw_register(). > > Sorry, I am still a little confused, all the clock register(clk_register()) > are via each different > clock types like imx_clk_gate4/imx_clk_pll14xx, if using clk_hw_register, > means we need > to re-write the clock driver using different clk register method, that will > make the driver > completely different from i.mx8mq/i.mx8mm, they are actually same series of > SoC as i.mx8mn, > it will introduce many confusion, is my understanding correct? And is it OK > to just keep what > it is and make them all aligned? >
Ok, the problem I'm trying to point out is that clk registrations need to be undone, i.e. clk_unregister() needs to be called, when the driver fails to probe. devm_*() is one way to do this, but if you have other ways of removing all the registered clks then that works too. Makes sense?