> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-edac-ow...@vger.kernel.org <linux-edac-ow...@vger.kernel.org> On > Behalf Of Borislav Petkov > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 11:59 AM > To: Ghannam, Yazen <yazen.ghan...@amd.com> > Cc: Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>; linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in > hardware > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 04:44:24PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > > I have another version of this set that I can send today. It includes > > the changes for this patch and also includes the fix for the locking > > bug message. > > > > Should I send out the new version? Or do you want me to wait for any > > fixes on top of the current version? > > I don't understand - I think we said to feel free to rework it all by using > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=rc0%2b3-ras > > and reworking the whole branch to accomodate the changes and then > sending a whole new series... >
Right, I took that branch, squashed the locking fix into patch 2, fixed up the remaining patches, and then redid the last patch. I plan to send the result as a v4 of this patchset with all the links, version history, etc. Is that what you mean? Sorry, if I misunderstood. Thanks, Yazen
