On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 09:25:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 0cbade024ba501313da3b7e5dd2a188a6bc491b5 ]
>
> fstests generic/228 reported this failure that fuse fallocate does not
> honor what 'ulimit -f' has set.
>
> This adds the necessary inode_newsize_ok() check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>
> Fixes: 05ba1f082300 ("fuse: add FALLOCATE operation")
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v3.5
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index d40c2451487cb..3ba45758e0938 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -2947,6 +2947,13 @@ static long fuse_file_fallocate(struct file *file, int
> mode, loff_t offset,
> }
> }
>
> + if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
> + offset + length > i_size_read(inode)) {
> + err = inode_newsize_ok(inode, offset + length);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
A later commit [1] was proposed to fix a problem of returning without unlock.
[1]:
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse/+/35d6fcbb7c3e296a52136347346a698a35af3fda
thanks,
-liubo
> + }
> +
> if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
