Hi Will, Is this series applicable to arm64 tree?
Thanks. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:37 PM Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote: > > > Some in-kernel headers use _BITUL() instead of BIT(). > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > arch/s390/include/asm/*.h > > I think the reason is because BIT() is currently not available > in assembly. It hard-codes 1UL, which is not available in assembly. > > 1/2 replaced > 1UL -> UL(1) > 0UL -> UL(0) > 1ULL -> ULL(1) > 0ULL -> ULL(0) > > With this, there is no more restriction that prevents assembly > code from using them. > > 2/2 is a clean-up as as example. > > I can contribute to cleanups of arch/s390/, etc. > once this series lands in upstream. > > I hope both patches can go in the arm64 tree. > > > > Masahiro Yamada (2): > linux/bits.h: make BIT(), GENMASK(), and friends available in assembly > arm64: replace _BITUL() with BIT() > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > include/linux/bits.h | 17 ++++--- > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
