On 27/08/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions > were getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not > solved?
I have tried to track all regressions, but it is a lot of work, so I center on development kernels. There are two lists (both unmaintained) http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622 http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2621 If you compare them, you will see "New regressions (submitted after 2.6.21 a.k.a. for -stable team)" - a long list of problems reported after 2.6.21 release. I really do not have time to track issues in stable releases. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
