From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 15:18:44 -0700

> On Wed, 29 May 2019 12:26:20 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>> +static int ocelot_flower_replace(struct tc_cls_flower_offload *f,
>> +                             struct ocelot_port_block *port_block)
>> +{
>> +    struct ocelot_ace_rule *rule;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    if (port_block->port->tc.block_shared)
>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> FWIW since you only support TRAP and DROP actions here (AFAICT) you
> should actually be okay with shared blocks.  The problems with shared
> blocks start when the action is stateful (like act_police), because we
> can't share that state between devices.  But for most actions which just
> maintain statistics, it's fine to allow shared blocks.  HTH

Please update to remove this test Horatiu, thanks.

Reply via email to