Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:15:12 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
>> Split the general PCI startup from the DMA handling code in order to
>> prepare for adding support for DCA services and future
>versions of the
>> ioatdma device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/dma/Makefile | 2
>> drivers/dma/ioat.c | 186
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c | 196
>+++++++++++-----------------------------------
>> drivers/dma/ioatdma.h | 16 +++-
>> drivers/dma/ioatdma_hw.h | 2
>> 5 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
>> index 9a4d154..9012176 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
>
>> - printk(KERN_INFO " "
>> - "ioatdma: Intel(R) I/OAT DMA Engine
>initialization failed\n");
>> -
>> - return err;
>> + iounmap(iobase);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR " "
>> + "ioatdma: Intel(R) I/OAT DMA Engine
>initialization failed\n");
>
>Drop the " " after KERN_ERR...
Yes, is dumb, but is addressed in the next patch in the series.
>
>> + return NULL;
>> }
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioatdma.h b/drivers/dma/ioatdma.h
>> index bf4dad7..26aff08 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ioatdma.h
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ioatdma.h
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>> #define IOAT_LOW_COMPLETION_MASK 0xffffffc0
>>
>> /**
>> - * struct ioat_device - internal representation of a IOAT device
>> + * struct ioatdma_device - internal representation of a IOAT device
>> * @pdev: PCI-Express device
>> * @reg_base: MMIO register space base address
>> * @dma_pool: for allocating DMA descriptors
>> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@
>> * @msi: Message Signaled Interrupt number
>> */
>>
>> -struct ioat_device {
>> +struct ioatdma_device {
>> struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> void __iomem *reg_base;
>> struct pci_pool *dma_pool;
>> struct pci_pool *completion_pool;
>>
>> struct dma_device common;
>> - u8 msi;
>> + u8 version;
>
>This field name change needs a corresponding change in the
>struct's kernel-doc above here.
Oops, missed that one - thanks.
>
>> };
>>
>> /**
>
>> @@ -117,4 +117,12 @@ struct ioat_desc_sw {
>> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor async_tx;
>> };
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_INTEL_IOATDMA) ||
>defined(CONFIG_INTEL_IOATDMA_MODULE)
>> +struct ioatdma_device *ioat_dma_probe(struct pci_dev *,
>void __iomem *);
>
>Please use parameter variable names in function prototypes (above;
>most places already have them).
Yep, I'll get it.
Again, thanks for your comments,
sln
--
======================================================================
Mr. Shannon Nelson LAN Access Division, Intel Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't speak for Intel
(503) 712-7659 Parents can't afford to be squeamish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
