On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > So we need to also check for -1 if !NUMA > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry. No we do not need this fix. The patch is fine as is. In slab_alloc() the slow path is entered if c->lockless is NULL. So it does not matter for slow path determination that node_match always returns 1 in the !NUMA case. c->node only needs to be checked for slow path determination in slab_free(). And there the node_match is not called. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
