Gustavo,

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> There is no need to compare hw_id with < 0 because such comparison
> of an unsigned value is always false.
> 
> Fix this by removing such comparison.


Thanks for fixing this. But we had to revert the commit that introduces
this issue. So this patch is no longer applicable.

> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1445440 ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: 3e6a8fb33084 ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add new operation to check if 
> a sensor is enabled")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> index 928e8e81ba69..94878ad35464 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ bool is_sensor_enabled(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id)
>       u32 val;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if ((hw_id > (priv->num_sensors - 1)) || (hw_id < 0))
> +     if (hw_id > priv->num_sensors - 1)
>               return -EINVAL;
>       ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN], &val);
>       if (ret)

Reply via email to