On (05/28/19 12:21), Tetsuo Handa wrote: [..] > What I suggested in my proposal ("printk: Introduce "store now but print > later" prefix." at > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1550896930-12324-1-git-send-email-penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/T/#u > ) > is "whether the caller wants to defer printing to consoles regarding > this printk() call". And your suggestion is "whether the caller wants > to apply ignore_loglevel regarding this printk() call".
I'm not sure about "store now but print later" here. What Dmitry is talking about: bump console_loglevel on *this* particular CPU only, not system-wide. /* Which is implemented in a form of - all messages from this-CPU * only should be printed regardless the loglevel, the rest should * pass the usual suppress_message_printing() check. */ -ss