On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:15:08PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > 
> >     ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx);
> > 
> >     mutex_lock(&lock_c);
> > 
> >     ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx);
> > 
> >     mutex_unlock(&lock_c);          (*)
> 
> > triggers the following WARN in __lock_release() when doing the unlock at *:
> > 
> >     DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1);
> > 
> > The problem is that the WARN check doesn't take into account the merging
> > of ww_lock_a and ww_lock_b which results in decreasing curr->lockdep_depth
> > by 2 not only 1.
> 
> Cute...
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > index c40fba54e324..967352d32af1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > @@ -3714,7 +3714,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, 
> > unsigned int subclass,
> >                             hlock->references = 2;
> >                     }
> >  
> > -                   return 1;
> > +                   return 2;
> >             }
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -3920,22 +3920,33 @@ static struct held_lock *find_held_lock(struct 
> > task_struct *curr,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int 
> > depth,
> > -                         int idx)
> > +                           int idx, bool *first_merged)
> >  {
> >     struct held_lock *hlock;
> > +   int first_idx = idx;
> >  
> >     if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> >             return 0;
> >  
> >     for (hlock = curr->held_locks + idx; idx < depth; idx++, hlock++) {
> > -           if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
> > +           switch (__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
> >                                 hlock_class(hlock)->subclass,
> >                                 hlock->trylock,
> >                                 hlock->read, hlock->check,
> >                                 hlock->hardirqs_off,
> >                                 hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
> > -                               hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
> > +                               hlock->references, hlock->pin_count)) {
> > +           case 0:
> >                     return 1;
> > +           case 1:
> > +                   break;
> > +           case 2:
> > +                   *first_merged = idx == first_idx;
> > +                   break;
> > +           default:
> > +                   WARN_ON(1);
> > +                   return 0;
> > +           }
> >     }
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Does it work for you if I change it like so?

Yep, works this way, and yes thought later that canceling *first_merged
for idx!=first_idx was a bit strange (even if it still worked).

> 
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -3712,7 +3712,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep
>                               hlock->references = 2;
>                       }
>  
> -                     return 1;
> +                     return 2;
>               }
>       }
>  
> @@ -3918,22 +3918,33 @@ static struct held_lock *find_held_lock(
>  }
>  
>  static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth,
> -                           int idx)
> +                             int idx, unsigned int *merged)
>  {
>       struct held_lock *hlock;
> +     int first_idx = idx;
>  
>       if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
>               return 0;
>  
>       for (hlock = curr->held_locks + idx; idx < depth; idx++, hlock++) {
> -             if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
> +             switch (__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
>                                   hlock_class(hlock)->subclass,
>                                   hlock->trylock,
>                                   hlock->read, hlock->check,
>                                   hlock->hardirqs_off,
>                                   hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
> -                                 hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
> +                                 hlock->references, hlock->pin_count)) {
> +             case 0:
>                       return 1;
> +             case 1:
> +                     break;
> +             case 2:
> +                     *merged += (idx == first_idx);
> +                     break;
> +             default:
> +                     WARN_ON(1);
> +                     return 0;
> +             }
>       }
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3944,9 +3955,9 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *loc
>                unsigned long ip)
>  {
>       struct task_struct *curr = current;
> +     unsigned int depth, merged = 0
>       struct held_lock *hlock;
>       struct lock_class *class;
> -     unsigned int depth;
>       int i;
>  
>       if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> @@ -3971,14 +3982,14 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *loc
>       curr->lockdep_depth = i;
>       curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
>  
> -     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i))
> +     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i, &merged))
>               return 0;
>  
>       /*
>        * I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have
>        * these 'spare' parts.. where shall I put them.
>        */
> -     if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth))
> +     if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - merged))
>               return 0;
>       return 1;
>  }
> @@ -3986,8 +3997,8 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *loc
>  static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
>  {
>       struct task_struct *curr = current;
> +     unsigned int depth, merged = 0;
>       struct held_lock *hlock;
> -     unsigned int depth;
>       int i;
>  
>       if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> @@ -4012,7 +4023,7 @@ static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockd
>       hlock->read = 1;
>       hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
>  
> -     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i))
> +     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i, &merged))
>               return 0;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -4021,6 +4032,11 @@ static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockd
>        */
>       if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth))
>               return 0;
> +
> +     /* Merging can't happen with unchanged classes.. */
> +     if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(merged))
> +             return 0;
> +
>       return 1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -4035,8 +4051,8 @@ static int
>  __lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
>  {
>       struct task_struct *curr = current;
> +     unsigned int depth, merged = 1;
>       struct held_lock *hlock;
> -     unsigned int depth;
>       int i;
>  
>       if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> @@ -4091,14 +4107,15 @@ __lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock,
>       if (i == depth-1)
>               return 1;
>  
> -     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i + 1))
> +     if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i + 1, &merged))
>               return 0;
>  
>       /*
>        * We had N bottles of beer on the wall, we drank one, but now
>        * there's not N-1 bottles of beer left on the wall...
> +      * Pouring two of the bottles together is acceptable.
>        */
> -     DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth-1);
> +     DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - merged);
>  
>       /*
>        * Since reacquire_held_locks() would have called check_chain_key()

Reply via email to