On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:51:37PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> In a rare case, flush_tlb_kernel_range() could be called with a start
> higher than the end. Most architectures should be fine with with this, but
> some may not like it, so avoid doing this.
> 
> In vm_remove_mappings(), in case page_address() returns 0 for all pages,
> _vm_unmap_aliases() will be called with start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0 and
> flush = 1.
> 
> If at the same time, the vmalloc purge operation is triggered by something
> else while the current operation is between remove_vm_area() and
> _vm_unmap_aliases(), then the vm mapping just removed will be already
> purged. In this case the call of vm_unmap_aliases() may not find any other
> mappings to flush and so end up flushing start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0. So
> only set flush = true if we find something in the direct mapping that we
> need to flush, and this way this can't happen.
> 
> Fixes: 868b104d7379 ("mm/vmalloc: Add flag for freeing of special 
> permsissions")
> Cc: Meelis Roos <mr...@linux.ee>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgeco...@intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 836888ae01f6..537d1134b40e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2125,6 +2125,7 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, 
> int deallocate_pages)
>       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
>       unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
>       int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS;
> +     int flush_dmap = 0;
>       int i;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -2163,6 +2164,7 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, 
> int deallocate_pages)
>               if (addr) {
>                       start = min(addr, start);
>                       end = max(addr + PAGE_SIZE, end);
> +                     flush_dmap = 1;
>               }
>       }
>  
> @@ -2172,7 +2174,7 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, 
> int deallocate_pages)
>        * reset the direct map permissions to the default.
>        */
>       set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_invalid_noflush);
> -     _vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, 1);
> +     _vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, flush_dmap);
>       set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
>  }

Hurmph.. another clue that this range flushing is crap I feel. The phys
addrs of the page array can be scattered all over the place, a range
doesn't properly represent things.

But yes, this seems like a minimal fix in spirit with the existing code.

Reply via email to