Shuah,
Want to take this or would you want me to? -- Steve On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:27:46 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote: > Hi Shuah, > > Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further > simillar errors before release... > > Thank you, > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases > > are checkbashisms clean. > > > > This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace: > > Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work. > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-jue...@canonical.com > > (Note that this is still under development) > > > > So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX > > compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly. > > To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase > > which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases. > > I think this can help us to find out whether it was > > written in a way out of POSIX. > > > > Thank you, > > > > --- > > > > Masami Hiramatsu (2): > > selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean > > selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase > > > > > > tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest | 1 + > > .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc | 2 +- > > .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc | 21 > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 > > tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc > > > > -- > > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhira...@kernel.org> > >
