On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 07:36:21PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Maybe your libc is different on the different machines? Normal programs > shouldn't use segments at all, so I really do not see how this patch could > matter in the least, even if it was completely and utterly buggy (which is > not obvious at first glance). > > I wonder why you seem to have an LDT at all.. glibc 2.2 linuxthreads sets up an LDT to use %gs as thread local data base pointer. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Roman Zippel
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] Generic deferred fi... Chris Mason
- Re: test13-pre6 (Fork Bug with Athlons? Temporary Fix) Byron Stanoszek
- Re: test13-pre6 (Fork Bug with Athlons? Temporary ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: test13-pre6 (Fork Bug with Athlons? Temporary ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: test13-pre6 (Fork Bug with Athlons? Temporary ... Graham Murray
- Re: test13-pre6 Dan Aloni
- Re: test13-pre6 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: test13-pre6 stewart