Spotted by taoyue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

collect_signal:                         sigqueue_free:

        list_del_init(&first->list);
                                                if (!list_empty(&q->list)) {
                                                        // not taken
                                                }
                                                q->flags &= ~SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC;

        __sigqueue_free(first);                 __sigqueue_free(q);

Now, __sigqueue_free() is called twice on the same "struct sigqueue" with the
obviously bad implications.

In particular, this double free breaks the array_cache->avail logic, so the
same sigqueue could be "allocated" twice, and the bug can manifest itself via
the "impossible" BUG_ON(!SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) in sigqueue_free/send_sigqueue.

Hopefully this can explain these mysterious bug-reports, see

        http://marc.info/?t=118766926500003
        http://marc.info/?t=118466273000005

Alexey Dobriyan reports this patch makes the difference for the testcase, but
nobody has an access to the application which opened the problems originally.

Also, this patch removes tasklist lock/unlock, ->siglock is enough.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- t/kernel/signal.c~SQFREE    2007-08-22 20:06:31.000000000 +0400
+++ t/kernel/signal.c   2007-08-23 16:02:57.000000000 +0400
@@ -1297,20 +1297,19 @@ struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void)
 void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
+       spinlock_t *lock = &current->sighand->siglock;
+
        BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
        /*
         * If the signal is still pending remove it from the
-        * pending queue.
+        * pending queue. We must hold ->siglock while testing
+        * q->list to serialize with collect_signal().
         */
-       if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
-               spinlock_t *lock = &current->sighand->siglock;
-               read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-               spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
-               if (!list_empty(&q->list))
-                       list_del_init(&q->list);
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
-               read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-       }
+       spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+       if (!list_empty(&q->list))
+               list_del_init(&q->list);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+
        q->flags &= ~SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC;
        __sigqueue_free(q);
 }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to