On Tue 21-05-19 08:25:55, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 05/20/2019 10:29 PM, Tim Murray wrote: [...] > > not seem to introduce a noticeable hot start penalty, not does it > > cause an increase in performance problems later in the app's > > lifecycle. I've measured with and without process_madvise, and the > > differences are within our noise bounds. Second, because we're not > > That is assuming that post process_madvise() working set for the application > is > always smaller. There is another challenge. The external process should > ideally > have the knowledge of active areas of the working set for an application in > question for it to invoke process_madvise() correctly to prevent such > scenarios.
But that doesn't really seem relevant for the API itself, right? The higher level logic the monitor's business. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
