Hi Greg,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:59:41AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:53:02AM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > On 8/22/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When buf_check_overflow() returns != 0 we will hit kfree(ERR_PTR(err))
> > > and it will not be happy about it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This seems to be in the current code as well, I'll forward-port the patch...
>
> Huh? It's not already in mainline? Then how did it ever get into the
> stable queue?
>
> Ugh.
Maybe someone sent it to stable@ and lkml at the same time and it got lost
on the second (noisy) path ? Judging from the patch, it got merged about
one month ago :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2.6$ git log v2.6.20..2.6.22.x -- fs/9p/conv.c|cat
commit b3b590287ca3c36e0a3fa28d626f126dd5226fc4
Author: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Jul 19 17:27:22 2007 -0700
fs: 9p/conv.c error path fix
When buf_check_overflow() returns != 0 we will hit kfree(ERR_PTR(err))
and it will not be happy about it.
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2.6$ git describe b3b590287ca3c36e0a3fa28d626f126dd5226fc4
v2.6.22.1-53-gb3b5902
But yes, I agree that it's very annoying when -stable contains patches
that are not in mainline. Fortunately, we have careful reviewers to
catch this when it happens !
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
