On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:17:38 +0100 Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/ > > > > - git-ixgbe.patch got dropped - git-net.patch destroyed it > > > > - then git-net got dropped as it doesn't work > > > > - the -mm import-to-git engine still isn't working > > > > >From elm3b6 on test.kernel.org, we get the following build error > > 08/22/07-07:01:07 building kernel - make bzImage > CHK include/linux/version.h > UPD include/linux/version.h > CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h > UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h > SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86_64 > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s > arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 > is not between 4 and 12 > make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 > make: *** [prepare0] Error 2 > 08/22/07-07:01:08 Build the kernel. Failed rc = 2 > 08/22/07-07:01:08 build: Building kernel... Failed rc = 1 > Failed and terminated the run > 08/22/07-07:01:08 command complete: (1) rc=126 (TEST ABORT) > Fatal error, aborting autorun > > config file at: http://test.kernel.org/abat/107411/build/dotconfig > gcc version is 3.4.4 > > This does not occur when using a cross-compiler gcc 3.4.0 > x86_64-mm-less-stack-alignment.patch has cflags-y += $(call cc-option,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3) So we _should_ have detected that gcc didn't like =3, so it should not have been used. I am suspecting a kbuild glitch: asm-offsets.c tends to be handled in special ways (ie: it's usually the thing which blows up first) so perhaps it is somehow avoiding the above does-gcc-support-this test. Suitable cc's added ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
