On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Cc Suren and Minchan - the email thread starts here 
> 20190514131654.25463-1-oleksa...@redhat.com]
> 
> On Wed 15-05-19 08:53:11, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > I will try to comment on the interface itself later. But I have to say
> > that I am not impressed. Abusing sysfs for per process features is quite
> > gross to be honest.
> 
> I have already commented on this in other email. I consider sysfs an
> unsuitable interface for per-process API.

Wait, what?  A new sysfs file/directory per process?  That's crazy, no
one must have benchmarked it :)

And I agree, sysfs is not for that, please don't abuse it.  Proc is for
process apis.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to