On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:54:52PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 23:58:36 +0100
> > From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Why exactly a power of two ? To get rid of ->index ?
> >
> > To make things like "page - mem_map" et al. use shifts instead of
> > expensive multiplies...
>
> I thought that is what ->index is for ?
No. "index" only gives the virtual index.
"page - mem_map" is how you get the _physical_ index in the zone in
question, which is common for physical tranlations (ie "pte_page()",
"page_to_virt()" or "page_to_phys()")
> Also gcc seems to be already quite clever at dividing through small
> integers, e.g. using mul and shift and sub, so it may not be even worth to reach
> for a real power-of-two.
Look at the code - it's a big multiply to do a divide by 68 or similar.
Quite expensive.
Doing "page->address - TASK_SIZE" on x86 for the non-highmem case would
probably be faster.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
