On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:50 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <b...@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> > > Setting a chip for an interrupt marks it as allocated. Since UM doesn't > support dynamic interrupt numbers (yet), it means we cannot simply > increase NR_IRQS and then use the free irqs between LAST_IRQ and NR_IRQS > with gpio-mockup or iio testing drivers as irq_alloc_descs() will fail > after not being able to neither find an unallocated range of interrupts > nor expand the range. > > Only call irq_set_chip_and_handler() for irqs until LAST_IRQ. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> > Reviewed-by: Anton Ivanov <anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com> > Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com>
Just noticed that this triggers the following errors while bootup: Trying to reregister IRQ 11 FD 8 TYPE 0 ID (null) write_sigio_irq : um_request_irq failed, err = -16 Trying to reregister IRQ 11 FD 8 TYPE 0 ID (null) write_sigio_irq : um_request_irq failed, err = -16 VFS: Mounted root (hostfs filesystem) readonly on Can you please check? This patch is already queued in -next. So we need to decide whether to revert or fix it now.