On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Fabien Dessenne wrote:

> The second parameter of devm_add_action_or_reset() shall be a function,
> not a function address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.desse...@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> index 9e33165..8748d4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int rmi_setup_irq_domain(struct hid_device *hdev)
>       if (!hdata->domain)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -     ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, &rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
> +     ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);

Why do you think this is wrong C?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to