From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
commit d58431eacb226222430940134d97bfd72f292fcd upstream.
A recent commit added a call to cache_fresh_locked()
when an expired item was found.
The call sets the CACHE_VALID flag, so it is important
that the item actually is valid.
There are two ways it could be valid:
1/ If ->update has been called to fill in relevant content
2/ if CACHE_NEGATIVE is set, to say that content doesn't exist.
An expired item that is waiting for an update will be neither.
Setting CACHE_VALID will mean that a subsequent call to cache_put()
will be likely to dereference uninitialised pointers.
So we must make sure the item is valid, and we already have code to do
that in try_to_negate_entry(). This takes the hash lock and so cannot
be used directly, so take out the two lines that we need and use them.
Now cache_fresh_locked() is certain to be called only on
a valid item.
Cc: sta...@kernel.org # 2.6.35
Fixes: 4ecd55ea0742 ("sunrpc: fix cache_head leak due to queued request")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static void cache_init(struct cache_head
h->last_refresh = now;
}
+static inline int cache_is_valid(struct cache_head *h);
static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry,
struct cache_detail *detail);
static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
@@ -105,6 +106,8 @@ static struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_a
if (cache_is_expired(detail, tmp)) {
hlist_del_init_rcu(&tmp->cache_list);
detail->entries --;
+ if (cache_is_valid(tmp) == -EAGAIN)
+ set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &tmp->flags);
cache_fresh_locked(tmp, 0, detail);
freeme = tmp;
break;
