Hi Jacob,

On 4/24/19 1:31 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Make use of generic IOASID code to manage PASID allocation,
> free, and lookup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/Kconfig       |  1 +
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |  9 ++++-----
>  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 36 ------------------------------------
>  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c   | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index 6f07f3b..7f92009 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>       bool "Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU"
>       depends on INTEL_IOMMU && X86
>       select PCI_PASID
> +     select IOASID
>       select MMU_NOTIFIER
>       help
>         Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) provides a facility for devices
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index ec6f22d..785330a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -5153,7 +5153,7 @@ static void auxiliary_unlink_device(struct dmar_domain 
> *domain,
>       domain->auxd_refcnt--;
>  
>       if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> -             intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
> +             ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
>  }
>  
>  static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> @@ -5171,9 +5171,8 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct dmar_domain 
> *domain,
>       if (domain->default_pasid <= 0) {
>               int pasid;
>  
> -             pasid = intel_pasid_alloc_id(domain, PASID_MIN,
> -                                          pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)),
> -                                          GFP_KERNEL);
> +             pasid = ioasid_alloc(NULL, PASID_MIN, 
> pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) - 1,
> +                             domain);
>               if (pasid <= 0) {
ioasid_t is a uint and returns INVALID_IOASID on error. Wouldn't it be
simpler to make ioasid_alloc return an int?
>                       pr_err("Can't allocate default pasid\n");
>                       return -ENODEV;
> @@ -5210,7 +5209,7 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct dmar_domain 
> *domain,
>       spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
>       if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> -             intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
> +             ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> index 5b1d3be..d339e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> @@ -26,42 +26,6 @@
>   */
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pasid_lock);
>  u32 intel_pasid_max_id = PASID_MAX;
> -static DEFINE_IDR(pasid_idr);
> -
> -int intel_pasid_alloc_id(void *ptr, int start, int end, gfp_t gfp)
> -{
> -     int ret, min, max;
> -
> -     min = max_t(int, start, PASID_MIN);
> -     max = min_t(int, end, intel_pasid_max_id);
> -
> -     WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
> -     idr_preload(gfp);
> -     spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
> -     ret = idr_alloc(&pasid_idr, ptr, min, max, GFP_ATOMIC);
> -     spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
> -     idr_preload_end();
> -
> -     return ret;
> -}
> -
> -void intel_pasid_free_id(int pasid)
> -{
> -     spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
> -     idr_remove(&pasid_idr, pasid);
> -     spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
> -}
> -
> -void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid)
> -{
> -     void *p;
> -
> -     spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
> -     p = idr_find(&pasid_idr, pasid);
> -     spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
> -
> -     return p;
> -}
>  
>  int vcmd_alloc_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, unsigned int *pasid)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> index 8f87304..8fff212 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmar.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  
>  #include "intel-pasid.h"
> @@ -211,7 +212,9 @@ static void intel_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, 
> struct mm_struct *mm)
>       rcu_read_lock();
>       list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdev, &svm->devs, list) {
>               intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(svm->iommu, sdev->dev, svm->pasid);
> -             intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1, 0, !svm->mm)> +     
>         /* for emulated iommu, PASID cache invalidation implies IOTLB/DTLB */
> +             if (!cap_caching_mode(svm->iommu->cap))
> +                     intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1, 0, 
> !svm->mm);
This change is not documented in the commit message. Isn't it a separate
fix?
>       }
>       rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> @@ -332,16 +335,15 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, 
> int flags, struct svm_dev_
>               if (pasid_max > intel_pasid_max_id)
>                       pasid_max = intel_pasid_max_id;
>  
> -             /* Do not use PASID 0 in caching mode (virtualised IOMMU) */
> -             ret = intel_pasid_alloc_id(svm,
> -                                        !!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap),
> -                                        pasid_max - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> -             if (ret < 0) {
> +             /* Do not use PASID 0, reserved for RID to PASID */
> +             svm->pasid = ioasid_alloc(NULL, PASID_MIN,
> +                                     pasid_max - 1, svm);
the fact the max is not decremented compared to intel_pasid_alloc_id
looks suspicious to me (exclusive to inclusive move). I guess it is a
fix in which case this may be documented in the commit msg?
> +             if (svm->pasid == INVALID_IOASID) {
>                       kfree(svm);
>                       kfree(sdev);
> +                     ret = ENOSPC;
-ENOSPC
>                       goto out;
>               }
> -             svm->pasid = ret;
>               svm->notifier.ops = &intel_mmuops;
>               svm->mm = mm;
>               svm->flags = flags;
> @@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int 
> flags, struct svm_dev_
>               if (mm) {
>                       ret = mmu_notifier_register(&svm->notifier, mm);
>                       if (ret) {
> -                             intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
> +                             ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
>                               kfree(svm);
>                               kfree(sdev);
>                               goto out;
> @@ -367,7 +369,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int 
> flags, struct svm_dev_
>               if (ret) {
>                       if (mm)
>                               mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, mm);
> -                     intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
> +                     ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
the ioasid_free returned value never is tested. Is it useful?
>                       kfree(svm);
>                       kfree(sdev);
>                       goto out;
> @@ -400,7 +402,12 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, int pasid)
>       if (!iommu)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(pasid);
> +     svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL);
> +     if (IS_ERR(svm)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(svm);
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
>       if (!svm)
>               goto out;
>  
> @@ -422,7 +429,7 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, int pasid)
>                               kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu);
>  
>                               if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) {
> -                                     intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
> +                                     ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
>                                       if (svm->mm)
>                                               
> mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, svm->mm);
>  
> @@ -457,10 +464,11 @@ int intel_svm_is_pasid_valid(struct device *dev, int 
> pasid)
>       if (!iommu)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(pasid);
> -     if (!svm)
> +     svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL);
> +     if (IS_ERR(svm)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(svm);
>               goto out;
> -
> +     }
>       /* init_mm is used in this case */
>       if (!svm->mm)
>               ret = 1;
> @@ -567,13 +575,12 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
>  
>               if (!svm || svm->pasid != req->pasid) {
>                       rcu_read_lock();
> -                     svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(req->pasid);
> +                     svm = ioasid_find(NULL, req->pasid, NULL);
>                       /* It *can't* go away, because the driver is not 
> permitted
>                        * to unbind the mm while any page faults are 
> outstanding.
>                        * So we only need RCU to protect the internal idr 
> code. */
>                       rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> -                     if (!svm) {
> +                     if (IS_ERR(svm) || !svm) {
>                               pr_err("%s: Page request for invalid PASID %d: 
> %08llx %08llx\n",
>                                      iommu->name, req->pasid, ((unsigned long 
> long *)req)[0],
>                                      ((unsigned long long *)req)[1]);
> 

Thanks

Eric

Reply via email to